Skip to content

Conversation

nielsdos
Copy link
Member

@nielsdos nielsdos commented Apr 4, 2025

This adds bindings to Curl's websocket support that was added in Curl 7.86.0. Instead of just pass-through C bindings, the API added here is a little more high-level from a type-safety perspective. I.e. this introduces an enum CurlWsMessageType and a DTO class CurlWsFrame for nicer and safer API handling.

Still WIP.

@bukka
Copy link
Member

bukka commented Apr 11, 2025

I think this should have RFC

@bukka
Copy link
Member

bukka commented Apr 11, 2025

Assuming you were asking about whether it should have RFC with that subject [RFC?]... :)

@nielsdos
Copy link
Member Author

I agree it needs an RFC, just wasn't sure if I was gonna do it. I'll wait for my other RFC to enter voting to start on this.

This adds bindings to Curl's websocket support that was added in
Curl 7.86.0. Instead of just pass-through C bindings, the API added
here is a little more high-level from a type-safety perspective.
I.e. this introduces an enum CurlWsMessageType and a DTO class
CurlWsFrame for nicer and safer API handling.

Still WIP.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants