Abstract.

In this paper, we revisit the damped Kepler problem within a general family of nonlinear damping forces with magnitude \(\delta \vert u\vert^{\beta }\vert \dot u\vert^{\alpha+1}\), depending on three parameters, \(\delta \gt 0,\alpha \ge 0\), and \(\beta \ge 0\), and address the general question of circularization whereby orbits tend to become more circular as they approach the sun. Our approach is based on dynamical systems theory, using blowup and desingularization as our main technical tools. We find that \(\gamma =\alpha+2\beta -3\) is an important quantity, with the special case \(\gamma=0\) separating circularization (\(-3\lt \gamma \lt 0\)) where the eccentricity converges to zero, i.e., \(e(t)\rightarrow 0\) as \(u(t)\rightarrow 0\), from cases (\(\gamma \gt 0\)) where \(e(t)\rightarrow 1\) as \(u(t)\rightarrow 0\), both on open sets of initial conditions. We find that circularization for \(-3\lt \gamma \lt 0\) occurs due to asymptotic stability of a zero-Hopf equilibrium point (i.e., the eigenvalues are \(\pm i \omega,0\)) of a three-dimensional reduced problem (which is analytic in the blowup coordinates). The attraction is therefore not hyperbolic and in particular not covered by standard dynamical systems theory. Instead we use recent results on normal forms of the zero-Hopf to locally bring the system into a form where the stability can be addressed directly. The case \(\gamma=0\) relates to a certain scaling symmetry (that is also present in the undamped Kepler problem) and in this case the system can be reduced to a planar system. We find that the eccentricity limits to \(4\delta^2\in (0,1)\) on an open subset of initial conditions for (\(0\lt \delta \lt \frac 12\) and \(\gamma=0\)). We also describe different properties of the solutions, including finite time blowup and the limit of the eccentricity vector. Interestingly, we find that circularization \(e(t)\rightarrow 0\) implies finite time blowup of solutions. We believe that our approach can be used to describe unbounded solutions.

Keywords

  1. blowup
  2. invariant manifolds
  3. damped Kepler problem
  4. circularization
  5. normal forms

MSC codes

  1. 37G05
  2. 37C99
  3. 37E99
  4. 37D

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
A. Bittmann, Doubly-resonant saddle-nodes in (C3,0) and the fixed singularity at infinity in Painlevé equations: Analytic classification, Ann. Inst. Fourier, 68 (2018), pp. 1715–1830, http://doi.org/10.5802/aif.3197.
2.
J. Carr, Applications of Centre Manifold Theory, Appl. Math. Sci. 35, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1981.
3.
A. Delshams, A. Guillamon, and J. T. Lázaro, A pseudo-normal form for planar vector fields, Qual. Theory Dyn. Syst., 3 (2002), pp. 51–82, http://doi.org/10.1007/BF02969333.
4.
F. Dumortier, J. Llibre, and J. C. Artes, Qualitative Theory of Planar Differential Systems, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006, http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32902-2.
5.
F. Dumortier and R. Roussarie, Canard cycles and center manifolds, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., 121 (1996), pp. 1–96.
6.
B. Hamilton and M. Crescimanno, Linear frictional forces cause orbits to neither circularize nor precess, J. Phys. A, 41 (2008), 235205, http://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/41/23/235205.
7.
A. Haraux, On some damped 2 body problems, Evol. Equ. Control Theory, 10 (2021), pp. 657–671, http://doi.org/10.3934/eect.2021009.
8.
S. Jelbart, K. U. Kristiansen, P. Szmolyan, and M. Wechselberger, Singularly perturbed oscillators with exponential nonlinearities, J. Dynam. Differential Equations, (2021), pp. 1–53, http://doi.org/10.1007/s10884-021-10041-1.
9.
K. U. Kristiansen, The regularized visible fold revisited, J. Nonlinear Sci., 30 (2020), pp. 2463–2511, http://doi.org/10.1007/s00332-020-09627-8.
10.
K. U. Kristiansen, Revisiting the Kepler problem with linear drag using the blowup method and normal form theory, Nonlinearity, 37 (2024), 035014, http://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6544/ad2379.
11.
K. U. Kristiansen and P. Szmolyan, Relaxation oscillations in substrate-depletion oscillators close to the nonsmooth limit, Nonlinearity, 34 (2021), pp. 1030–1083, http://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6544/abb542.
12.
M. Krupa and P. Szmolyan, Extending geometric singular perturbation theory to nonhyperbolic points—fold and canard points in two dimensions, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 33 (2001), pp. 286–314, http://doi.org/10.1137/S0036141099360919.
13.
A. Margheri and M. Misquero, A dissipative Kepler problem with a family of singular drags, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron., 132 (2020), 17, http://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-020-9956-7.
14.
A. Margheri, R. Ortega, and C. Rebelo, First integrals for the Kepler problem with linear drag, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron., 127 (2017), pp. 35–48, http://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-016-9715-y.
15.
A. Margheri, R. Ortega, and C. Rebelo, On a family of Kepler problems with linear dissipation, Rend. Istit. Mat. Univ. Trieste, 49 (2017), pp. 265–286, http://doi.org/10.13137/2464-8728/16216.
16.
F. Moulton, An Introduction to Celestial Mechanics, Dover Books in Astronomy, Dover Publications, 1970, http://books.google.dk/books?id=URPSrBntwdAC.
17.
L. Perko, Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems, Springer, 2001.
18.
H. Poincaré, Leçons sur les hypothéses cosmogoniques, Libraire Scientifique A, Hermann et fils, 1911.
19.
H. Poincaré, The capture hypothesis of T. J. J. See, Monist, 22 (1912), pp. 460–472, http://doi.org/10.1093/monist/22.3.460.
20.
T. See, Researches on the Evolution of the Stellar Systems, Vol. II, Thomas P. Nichols, Lynn, 1910.