DEV Community

Cover image for The Architecture Shift: Why I'm Betting on Local-First in 2026.
Jakob Sandström
Jakob Sandström

Posted on

The Architecture Shift: Why I'm Betting on Local-First in 2026.

Looking beyond the AI hype, a quieter revolution is happening in how we handle data state. Here is my perspective on the stack for 2026.

The dust from the AI explosion of 2024 and 2025 is finally starting to settle. While we were all busy integrating LLM APIs and figuring out RAG pipelines, another shift has been happening quietly in the background. It is less flashy, but it solves a problem that users actually feel every day: latency and reliability.
Entering 2026, I am adjusting my learning roadmap. I am moving away from complex microservices for standard CRUD apps and focusing on the Local-First paradigm.
Here is why, and what I plan to build to test the waters.
The Problem with "Online-Only"
For the past decade, we have accepted a specific contract with our users: If you don't have a stable internet connection, this application is a brick.
We built optimistic UI updates to mask the network latency, but under the hood, we are still chained to the request/response cycle. If the server hangs, the spinner spins. If the tunnel drops, the data is lost.
In 2026, I believe the tolerance for this fragility will disappear. Users now expect web apps to feel as snappy as native desktop software.
The Stack: SQLite in the Browser
The technology that makes this possible isn't new, but the ecosystem around it has finally matured. The combination of WASM (WebAssembly) and SQLite running directly in the browser is the game changer.
Instead of fetching data from an API every time a user navigates, we replicate the relevant slice of the database to the client. The app reads and writes to a local SQLite file instantly. Background processes handle the sync with the server when the network permits.
It flips the architecture:

  • Old way: The Client is a view layer; the Server is the source of truth.
  • New way: The Client has its own source of truth; the Server is a synchronization relay. My Project Prediction for 2026: The "Invisible" Sync Engine I am currently experimenting with a project concept that I think will define the next wave of SaaS tools. The Concept: A Collaborative Logic Mapper Think of a tool like Miro or Trello, but completely offline-capable. You and a colleague can edit the same board while on a train with spotty Wi-Fi. The moment you reconnect, the changes merge intelligently without "last-write-wins" overwriting your work. To build this, I am looking at:
  • CRDTs (Conflict-free Replicated Data Types): This is the math that allows two people to edit the same data structure offline and merge it mathematically perfectly later.
  • ElectricSQL / Replicache: These serve as the sync engine. They handle the "plumbing" between the local SQLite instance and the backend Postgres. Why this matters for your career If you are a frontend developer, your role is expanding. You are no longer just consuming APIs; you are effectively becoming a database administrator for the client-side instance. If you are a backend developer, your focus shifts from building REST endpoints to designing robust synchronization protocols and authority rules. Code Example: The Mental Shift Typically, we write efficient fetch calls. In a local-first world, we write efficient subscriptions. Instead of this: // The 2020-2025 way async function loadDashboard() { setIsLoading(true); const data = await fetch('/api/stats'); render(data); setIsLoading(false); }

We are moving toward this:
// The 2026 way
const stats = useQuery(db.select().from(statsTable));
// Returns immediately from local memory.
// Reacts instantly to local writes.
// Reacts eventually to remote writes (via sync).

Conclusion
AI will obviously remain a massive part of 2026, specifically regarding agentic workflows. But I believe the developers who can combine AI intelligence with the raw speed and reliability of Local-First architectures will build the products that actually retain users.
I will be documenting my attempt to build this synchronization engine over the coming months. If you have experience with CRDTs in production, I would value your input in the comments.
What is on your roadmap for 2026?

Top comments (22)

Collapse
 
alptekin profile image
alptekin I.

That is very interesting. Certainly worth looking into. Thanks for sharing. I am looking forward to seeing any post on this. So i hope you do.

Collapse
 
the_nortern_dev profile image
Jakob Sandström

Glad to hear that, Alptekin. I am definitely planning to document the build process as I go. The next post will likely dive deeper into the specific sync engine setup. Thanks for reading.

Collapse
 
drodriguez1865 profile image
drodriguez1865

This is a very interesting take and looking forward to your future posts on this. I am sure that the concept is not new but I completely agree that a shift to local-first is soon to be upon us. Especially when applications start to utilize condensed or stripped back versions of LLMs.

But great minds think alike because I was just thinking about this very thing last month. I am currently building an application that requires multiple users to interact with the same data set and having offline access is important since it is a construction based project. Some locations at the construction site might not have internet access but the biggest hurdle I am facing is CRDTs and the algorithm needed to properly sync the changes to/from the server.

Great read and look forward to future posts!

Collapse
 
the_nortern_dev profile image
Jakob Sandström

Construction sites are actually the textbook definition of why "Cloud-First" fails. When you are in a basement or a remote site, 5G doesn't matter.
​You are spot on about the local LLMs too. Running a quantized model right next to the local database is going to unlock some powerful workflows.
​Regarding your CRDT struggle: My advice is to avoid writing your own sync algorithm from scratch if you can help it. It is a rabbit hole of edge cases. If you haven't yet, take a look at ElectricSQL or PowerSync. They basically act as a bridge between your backend Postgres and the client SQLite, handling the conflict resolution logic for you. It might save you months of headaches.

Collapse
 
drodriguez1865 profile image
drodriguez1865

I’ve already got a taste of the headache trying to write my own algorithm, haha. I appreciate the suggestions. I’ll look into them both and see which works best at solving this headache.

Collapse
 
leob profile image
leob

Sounds ambitious, and relevant - but this isn't an entirely "new" thing, or is it? I think there are already products/frameworks out there which attempt to do exactly this - I can't remember any names off the top of my head (too lazy to look it up right now), but I'm pretty sure that stuff with these capabilities does exist ...

Collapse
 
the_nortern_dev profile image
Jakob Sandström

You are absolutely right, Leo. The concept is definitely not new. We've had tools like PouchDB/CouchDB, RxDB, and even Meteor (with its optimistic UI) for years.

The "new" part that I find exciting is the maturity of WASM + SQLite. Moving from document/JSON sync (which many of the older libraries relied on) to a full, relational SQL database running directly in the browser feels like a massive leap forward in capability.

It’s less about "inventing" the idea and more about the ecosystem finally catching up to the vision!

Collapse
 
leob profile image
leob

Thanks, cool!

"I will be documenting my attempt to build this synchronization engine over the coming months"

Will be following it if you post it here!

Thread Thread
 
the_nortern_dev profile image
Jakob Sandström

Thanks! I intend to keep the whole series right here on Dev.to. Having critical eyes on the implementation, especially the sync logic, will be valuable, so I look forward to your input when the code drops.

Collapse
 
lucas_lamounier_cd8603fee profile image
Lucas Lamounier

Adorei a visão sobre local-first! SQLite no browser + sync engine é really game-changing. A parte sobre developers becoming "database administrators" pra client-side é spot on.

Collapse
 
the_nortern_dev profile image
Jakob Sandström

​Thanks, Lucas. That shift from just fetching data to actually modeling it on the client is going to be the biggest hurdle for many of us. But the performance gains are definitely worth it.

Some comments may only be visible to logged-in visitors. Sign in to view all comments.