DEV Community

Akash for MechCloud Academy

Posted on • Edited on

Fetch API vs Axios: Which One Should You Use in 2025?

In the world of web development, making HTTP requests is as fundamental as writing HTML. It's the lifeblood of any dynamic application, connecting your frontend to the vast universe of data and services available through APIs. For years, the JavaScript community has been centered around two giants in this space: the native Fetch API and the venerable library, Axios.

Back in 2018, the answer to "Which one should I use?" was often "Axios, for its superior features and ease of use." But the web development landscape is not static. Browsers have evolved, standards have solidified, and Node.js has made significant strides.

So, as we look towards 2025, the debate is more nuanced and interesting than ever. Is the built-in Fetch API powerful enough to be your default choice? Or does Axios still hold the crown as the king of HTTP clients?

This guide will break down the key differences, explore practical use cases, and give you a clear framework for deciding which tool is right for your projects in 2025.

What is the Fetch API?

The Fetch API is a modern, powerful, and flexible interface for fetching resources across the network. It's a native web API, meaning it's built directly into all modern browsers and, crucially, is now a stable, built-in feature in Node.js (since v18).

At its core, Fetch is a Promise-based API that makes asynchronous requests feel clean and modern.

Here’s a basic GET request with Fetch:

fetch('http://api.example.com/data')
  .then(response => {
    // Before we can use the data, we have to parse the response body
    if (!response.ok) {
      throw new Error(`HTTP error! Status: ${response.status}`);
    }
    return response.json(); // Returns another promise
  })
  .then(data => {
    console.log(data);
  })
  .catch(error => {
    console.error('Fetch error:', error);
  });
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Notice two key things right away:

  1. Two-step Process for JSON: You get a response object first, and then you have to explicitly call a method like response.json() or response.text() to parse the body of the response.
  2. Error Handling: Fetch only rejects a promise on a network failure (e.g., no internet connection). It does not reject on HTTP error statuses like 404 Not Found or 500 Internal Server Error. You must check for response.ok or response.status yourself.

What is Axios?

Axios is a third-party, Promise-based HTTP client library. For years, it has been the de-facto standard for making HTTP requests in both browsers and Node.js applications. It's essentially a feature-rich wrapper that smooths out many of the rough edges of working with network requests.

Here’s the same GET request using Axios:

import axios from 'axios';

axios.get('http://api.example.com/data')
  .then(response => {
    // Data is already parsed and available in response.data
    console.log(response.data);
  })
  .catch(error => {
    // Axios automatically rejects the promise on 4xx/5xx errors
    console.error('Axios error:', error.message);
  });
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The immediate benefits are clear: the JSON is automatically parsed and available in response.data, and it handles HTTP errors gracefully by rejecting the promise, which is often the behavior developers expect.

Head-to-Head Comparison for 2025

Let's break down the comparison across the features that matter most to developers today.

1. Syntax and Ease of Use

  • Fetch: The syntax is lean but requires more boilerplate for common tasks. Sending JSON data in a POST request, for example, requires you to manually stringify the body and set the Content-Type header.

    // Fetch POST Request
    fetch('http://api.example.com/users', {
      method: 'POST',
      headers: {
        'Content-Type': 'application/json'
      },
      body: JSON.stringify({ name: 'John Doe' })
    });
    
  • Axios: The syntax is more intuitive and developer-friendly. It handles data transformation automatically.

    // Axios POST Request
    axios.post('http://api.example.com/users', {
      name: 'John Doe'
    });
    

Winner: Axios. For pure out-of-the-box developer experience, Axios is undeniably cleaner and requires less code for common operations.

2. Error Handling

This is one of the most significant differentiators.

  • Fetch: As mentioned, it only fails on network errors. A 404 is a "successful" request from Fetch's perspective. This forces you to write a manual check in every single .then() block, which is repetitive and error-prone.
  • Axios: Rejects promises on any 4xx or 5xx status code. This allows you to handle all application-level errors within a single .catch() block, leading to cleaner and more predictable code.

Winner: Axios. Its intuitive error handling is a massive quality-of-life improvement.

3. Interceptors

Interceptors allow you to run code or modify requests and responses globally before they are sent or handled by your application logic. This is incredibly useful for setting authentication tokens, logging, or formatting response data.

  • Fetch: Has no built-in concept of interceptors. You have to implement your own wrapper or "factory" function to achieve this, which adds complexity to your codebase.
  • Axios: Has first-class support for interceptors, and they are trivial to implement.

    // Example: Add an auth token to every request
    axios.interceptors.request.use(config => {
      const token = localStorage.getItem('authToken');
      if (token) {
        config.headers.Authorization = `Bearer ${token}`;
      }
      return config;
    });
    

Winner: Axios. This feature alone is often the reason large applications choose Axios. It's a powerful tool for keeping your API logic clean and centralized.

4. Dependencies and Bundle Size

This is where the game has changed in favor of Fetch.

  • Fetch: Zero dependencies. It's built into the platform (browsers and Node.js). This means no extra kilobytes added to your application's bundle size. For library authors or those chasing peak performance on performance-critical websites, this is a huge advantage.
  • Axios: Is a library you must install (npm install axios). While not massive, it still adds to your bundle size (around 25-30 kB before gzipping). In an era of performance budgets and Core Web Vitals, every kilobyte counts.

Winner: Fetch. Being native is an unbeatable advantage in the performance category.

5. Request Cancellation & Timeouts

  • Fetch: Supports cancellation through the AbortController API. It's powerful and standardized but can feel a bit verbose for a simple timeout.

    const controller = new AbortController();
    const timeoutId = setTimeout(() => controller.abort(), 5000); // 5s timeout
    
    fetch('/data', { signal: controller.signal })
      .catch(error => {
        if (error.name === 'AbortError') {
          console.log('Request timed out!');
        }
      });
    
  • Axios: Provides a simple timeout property in its config object. It also supports AbortController if you need more complex cancellation logic.

    axios.get('/data', {
      timeout: 5000 // 5s timeout
    }).catch(error => {
      if (axios.isCancel(error)) {
        console.log('Request timed out!');
      }
    });
    

Winner: A tie, leaning towards Axios. While both can do it, the simple timeout config in Axios is more convenient for the most common use case.

The 2025 Verdict: A Pragmatic Decision Tree

So, with all that said, here’s how to decide in 2025. It's no longer a simple "one vs. the other" choice. It's about context.

Choose the Fetch API if...

  1. You are building a simple application or script. For a few GET requests where you don't need complex features, Fetch is lightweight and gets the job done without any overhead.
  2. Performance and bundle size are your top priorities. If you're building a high-performance public website or a JavaScript library, avoiding external dependencies is crucial. Fetch is the clear winner here.
  3. You are working within a modern framework. Frameworks like Next.js, SvelteKit, or Remix have their own data-fetching functions (useSWR, use, useFetch) that are built on top of Fetch. They already provide caching, error handling, and other features, making Axios redundant in many cases.
  4. You enjoy building your own abstractions. If you're comfortable creating a lightweight API client wrapper to handle error checking and interceptor-like logic, you can get the best of both worlds: a custom, tailored client with zero dependencies.

Choose Axios if...

  1. You are building a large-scale, complex application. For applications that make dozens or hundreds of API calls, the centralized control offered by Axios interceptors is invaluable for authentication, logging, and error reporting.
  2. Developer experience and speed are paramount. The out-of-the-box conveniences—automatic JSON parsing, intuitive error handling, simple timeout configuration—mean you'll write less boilerplate and ship features faster.
  3. You need features that Fetch lacks. If you require client-side upload progress tracking or protection against Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF), Axios has these built-in.
  4. Your team is already familiar with it. In a team environment, sticking with a well-known, feature-rich tool that everyone understands can be more valuable than saving a few kilobytes.

The Rise of the Third Option: Lightweight Wrappers

In 2025, it's also worth considering a middle ground: libraries like ky or ofetch (used by Nuxt 3). These are modern, lightweight libraries built directly on top of the Fetch API. They aim to provide an Axios-like developer experience (better defaults, error handling, hooks) while keeping the bundle size incredibly small. They represent a "best of both worlds" approach that is gaining significant traction.

Final Thoughts

The debate of Fetch vs. Axios has matured. In 2025, Fetch is the new default baseline, and Axios is the powerful, feature-rich upgrade you opt into when you need it.

The fact that Fetch is now native to both browsers and Node.js makes it a universal, dependency-free standard. For simple projects or within opinionated frameworks, it's often all you need.

However, Axios hasn't lost its relevance. It's a battle-tested tool that prioritizes developer experience and provides a robust feature set that can save you significant time and effort on complex projects.

Your choice depends on your project's needs:

  • Need speed and no dependencies? Use Fetch.
  • Need features and convenience? Use Axios.
  • Want a modern middle ground? Explore a lightweight wrapper like ky.

The modern developer is no longer just picking a tool but is making a strategic decision based on the specific trade-offs of their project. Choose wisely.

Top comments (0)